Provider Dossier · Subscription (flat-rate)
cheapestinference
Flat-rate subscription pricing that decouples cost from token volume.
The Datum Index verdict
Recommended with confidence
Ranked No. 11 of 20 in our composite reputation index, and currently improving.
≈ 4.2 / 5 aggregate · 96 reviewer notes
Composite index · reviewed 10 July 2026
Findings
- cheapestinference holds a Datum Index composite reputation of 83 / 100 (≈ 4.2 / 5), ranked No. 11 of 20.
- It is a subscription (flat-rate) based in United States, founded 2025, offering open-weight model access.
- Its flagship offering is Flat-rate open-model access, exposed through an OpenAI-compatible API.
- Indicative pricing is $0.25 / 1M tokens in / $0.35 / 1M tokens out (seed confidence).
- Reference throughput is ~120 tok/s with ~340 ms time-to-first-token; stated uptime is 99.5%.
cheapestinference enters our index at No. 11, a placement that reads as recommended with confidence. The composite rests on 96 reviewer notes gathered across the public record, and it is best understood not as a score out of ten but as a standing among peers. The trend line is pointed upward: reviewer sentiment has strengthened over recent quarters.
Read what follows as an editorial assessment rather than a datasheet. Where a figure below carries a seed mark, treat it as an illustration of the shape of the offering, not a quotable fact.
In its favour
Flat-rate subscription pricing that decouples cost from token volume.
On the numbers that flatter it: open-weight access, 1 named compliance attestation, and a reference throughput of ~120 tokens per second.
Points of concern
Newest entrant with the shortest public track record.
The caveat a buyer should price in before committing production traffic. As with every entry, we weigh it against the field rather than against perfection.
Incident & Uptime Note
The record of being there
cheapestinference states an availability of 99.5%. Held over a full year, that headline implies on the order of 43.8 hours of cumulative unavailability — a useful sense of scale, though real incidents cluster rather than spread evenly, and a single bad afternoon can outweigh a quiet quarter.
Datum Index does not operate first-party probes. Uptime here is drawn from the provider's own status disclosures and the public incident record; it is a reputation input, not an SLA. Where a provider publishes a status page, we recommend watching it directly before committing critical traffic.
Key Facts
The record, in brief
| Category | Subscription (flat-rate) |
|---|---|
| Headquarters | United States |
| Founded | 2025 |
| Model access | Open-weight |
| Flagship / reference | Flat-rate open-model access · Llama 3.3 70B |
| OpenAI-compatible API | Yes |
| Indicative price (in / out) | $0.25 / 1M tokens / $0.35 / 1M tokens seed |
| Reference throughput | ~120 tok/s |
| Reference TTFT | ~340 ms |
| Stated uptime | 99.5% |
| Compliance | GDPR |
| Composite reputation | 83 / 100 · ≈ 4.2 / 5 · 96 notes |
Reviewer Notes
What the field says
The 96 notes behind cheapestinference's standing are drawn from the accumulated public verdict of practitioners — the recurring praises and the recurring gripes — rather than from any single survey. Two themes dominate. Admirers return to one point above all: Flat-rate subscription pricing that decouples cost from token volume. Detractors return to another: Newest entrant with the shortest public track record.
We publish neither individual reviews nor reviewer identities; the composite is an editorial synthesis, and the reviewer-note count is an order-of-magnitude indication of how much public signal informs it.
Related dossiers · see also
Peer entries in the same or adjacent category, for comparison against cheapestinference's standing.